refactor(users-edit): migrate to actionEditContext (step 6)

Cluster-2 pilot — first migration of a standard edit action whose
tenant-scope semantics use null = "manage all" (instead of the
boolean-flag pattern in cluster 1). The CONTEXT-stage vorspiel
collapses into one declarative actionEditContext call; everything
below the vorspiel (conditional audit, custom fields, security
artifacts, two-level submit-authorize, mergeTenantIdsPreservingOutOfScope,
post-save theme/locale/session hooks) stays callsite — domain logic.

Confirms the analyst hypothesis: actionEditContext +
tenantScopeFlagKey:'can_manage_tenants' is enough — no helper
extension. The override key was built in step 1, unit-tested at the
building-block level, and now production-validated.

Two callsite tenant-filter rewrites (GET line 98-105, POST line
190-208) replace is_array($allowedTenantIds) with
$tenantScope['scope']/$tenantScope['ids'] discrimination.
mergeTenantIdsPreservingOutOfScope still receives a list<int> — only
the argument source shifts; the function itself is unchanged.

Three drift decisions reproduced: notFoundFlashScopeKey:'user_not_found',
t() consistency on Flash::success('User updated'), defensive
$canManageAllTenants = $tenantScope['scope'] === 'all'. The legacy
$canManageTenants capability boolean stays alongside (it still gates
strict-mode fallback — both variables now coexist by design).

DetailDrawerFragmentContractTest gets an additive recognizer for
actionEditContext / actionCreateContext / actionFragmentContext
ability-key extraction. Without it the test couldn't see the
aggregator-mediated authorize call in users-edit, so the auth-parity
check against users/view-fragment would regress. Pure addition; the
legacy direct-authorize() regex path is untouched.

ActionContextCsrfPairingContractTest now covers five callers
(departments, tenants, roles, permissions, users) and stays green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-04-26 14:10:08 +02:00
parent a038d0921b
commit 480b57ef04
2 changed files with 83 additions and 43 deletions

View File

@@ -40,26 +40,50 @@ $passwordHints = $userPasswordPolicyService->hints();
$currentUserId = (int) ($session['user']['id'] ?? 0);
$uuid = trim((string) ($id ?? ''));
$editTarget = requestPathWithReturnTarget("admin/users/edit/{$uuid}", $returnTarget);
$user = $uuid !== '' ? $userAccountService->findByUuid($uuid) : null;
if (!$user) {
Flash::error('User not found', $closeTarget, 'user_not_found');
Router::redirect($closeTarget);
}
// Resolve the user BEFORE the aggregator so the authorize-context can carry
// the real target_user_id (matches today's order: lookup -> CONTEXT authorize
// -> Router::redirect on forbidden). The aggregator receives a trivial finder
// that returns the already-loaded model so its not-found branch fires only
// when findByUuid() returned null.
$user = $uuid !== '' ? $userAccountService->findByUuid($uuid) : null;
$userId = (int) ($user['id'] ?? 0);
$contextDecision = $authorizationService->authorize(UserAuthorizationPolicy::ABILITY_ADMIN_USERS_EDIT_CONTEXT, [
$context = actionEditContext([
'finder' => static fn (string $_id): mixed => $user,
'rawId' => $uuid,
'notFoundFlashKey' => 'User not found',
'notFoundRedirectPath' => $closeTarget,
'notFoundFlashScopeKey' => 'user_not_found',
'abilityKey' => UserAuthorizationPolicy::ABILITY_ADMIN_USERS_EDIT_CONTEXT,
'context' => [
'actor_user_id' => $currentUserId,
'target_user_id' => $userId,
],
'viewAuthFlags' => [
'can_view_users',
'can_view_page',
'can_edit_user',
'can_edit_assignments',
'can_manage_tenants',
'can_edit_custom_field_values',
'can_manage_api_tokens',
'can_view_user_meta',
'can_view_user_audit',
'can_access_pdf',
'can_delete_user',
'can_view_security_artifacts',
'can_view_permissions_table',
'is_own_account',
],
'forbiddenStrategy' => 'redirect',
'tenantScopeFlagKey' => 'can_manage_tenants',
]);
if (!$contextDecision->isAllowed()) {
Router::redirect('error/forbidden');
return;
}
$user = is_array($context['model']) ? $context['model'] : $user;
$capabilities = $context['capabilities'];
$tenantScope = $context['tenantScope'];
$viewAuth = $context['viewAuth'];
$capabilities = $contextDecision->attribute('capabilities', []);
if (!is_array($capabilities)) {
$capabilities = [];
}
$canViewUsers = (bool) ($capabilities['can_view_users'] ?? false);
$canViewPage = (bool) ($capabilities['can_view_page'] ?? false);
$canEditUser = (bool) ($capabilities['can_edit_user'] ?? false);
@@ -74,15 +98,11 @@ $canDeleteUser = (bool) ($capabilities['can_delete_user'] ?? false);
$canViewSecurityArtifacts = (bool) ($capabilities['can_view_security_artifacts'] ?? false);
$canViewPermissionsTable = (bool) ($capabilities['can_view_permissions_table'] ?? false);
$isOwnAccount = (bool) ($capabilities['is_own_account'] ?? false);
$allowedTenantIdsRaw = $capabilities['allowed_tenant_ids'] ?? null;
$allowedTenantIds = is_array($allowedTenantIdsRaw)
? array_values(array_unique(array_filter(array_map('intval', $allowedTenantIdsRaw), static fn (int $tenantId): bool => $tenantId > 0)))
: null;
if (!$canViewPage) {
Router::redirect('error/forbidden');
return;
}
// $canManageAllTenants = Tupel-Diskriminator (true wenn Aggregator scope='all'
// liefert via tenantScopeFlagKey='can_manage_tenants'-Override). $canManageTenants
// bleibt als Capability-Flag erhalten — semantisch aequivalent, aber unterschiedliche
// Quelle. Filter-Branches unten nutzen $canManageAllTenants als Tupel-Diskriminator.
$canManageAllTenants = $tenantScope['scope'] === 'all';
if ($canViewUserMeta || $canViewUserAudit) {
app(\MintyPHP\Service\Audit\AuditMetadataEnricherInterface::class)->enrich($user, ['created_by', 'modified_by', 'active_changed_by']);
@@ -95,18 +115,20 @@ $scopeGateway = app(\MintyPHP\Service\Tenant\TenantScopeService::class);
$strictTenantScope = $scopeGateway->isStrict();
$tenants = $tenantService->list();
if (is_array($allowedTenantIds)) {
$tenants = array_values(array_filter($tenants, static function (array $tenant) use ($allowedTenantIds): bool {
if (!$canManageAllTenants) {
if (count($tenantScope['ids']) > 0) {
$tenants = array_values(array_filter($tenants, static function (array $tenant) use ($tenantScope): bool {
$tenantId = (int) ($tenant['id'] ?? 0);
return $tenantId > 0 && in_array($tenantId, $allowedTenantIds, true);
return $tenantId > 0 && in_array($tenantId, $tenantScope['ids'], true);
}));
} elseif (!$canManageTenants && $strictTenantScope) {
} elseif ($strictTenantScope) {
$tenants = [];
}
}
$selectedTenantIds = $userTenantRepository->listTenantIdsByUserId($userId);
if (is_array($allowedTenantIds)) {
$selectedTenantIds = array_values(array_intersect($selectedTenantIds, $allowedTenantIds));
if (!$canManageAllTenants && count($tenantScope['ids']) > 0) {
$selectedTenantIds = array_values(array_intersect($selectedTenantIds, $tenantScope['ids']));
}
$primaryTenantId = (int) ($user['primary_tenant_id'] ?? 0);
if (!$primaryTenantId && count($selectedTenantIds) === 1) {
@@ -187,22 +209,22 @@ if ($request->isMethod('POST')) {
$existingTenantIds = $userTenantRepository->listTenantIdsByUserId($userId);
$tenantIdsForSync = $tenantIds;
if ($canEditAssignments && is_array($allowedTenantIds)) {
$tenantIds = array_values(array_intersect($tenantIds, $allowedTenantIds));
if ($canEditAssignments && !$canManageAllTenants && count($tenantScope['ids']) > 0) {
$tenantIds = array_values(array_intersect($tenantIds, $tenantScope['ids']));
$tenantIdsForSync = $scopeGateway->mergeTenantIdsPreservingOutOfScope(
$tenantIds,
$existingTenantIds,
$allowedTenantIds
$tenantScope['ids']
);
} elseif ($canEditAssignments && !$canManageTenants && $strictTenantScope) {
} elseif ($canEditAssignments && !$canManageAllTenants && $strictTenantScope) {
$tenantIds = [];
$tenantIdsForSync = $existingTenantIds;
}
if (!$canEditAssignments) {
$tenantIds = $userTenantRepository->listTenantIdsByUserId($userId);
if (is_array($allowedTenantIds)) {
$tenantIds = array_values(array_intersect($tenantIds, $allowedTenantIds));
if (!$canManageAllTenants && count($tenantScope['ids']) > 0) {
$tenantIds = array_values(array_intersect($tenantIds, $tenantScope['ids']));
}
$tenantIdsForSync = $tenantIds;
}
@@ -285,10 +307,10 @@ if ($request->isMethod('POST')) {
if (!$errorBag->hasAny()) {
$action = (string) ($post['action'] ?? 'save');
if ($action === 'save_close') {
Flash::success('User updated', $closeTarget, 'user_updated');
Flash::success(t('User updated'), $closeTarget, 'user_updated');
Router::redirect($closeTarget);
} else {
Flash::success('User updated', $editTarget, 'user_updated');
Flash::success(t('User updated'), $editTarget, 'user_updated');
Router::redirect($editTarget);
}
}

View File

@@ -191,6 +191,11 @@ class DetailDrawerFragmentContractTest extends TestCase
* Extract the first top-level (non-nested) authorize / requireAbility ability
* argument from a PHP source string. Returns null and records a violation
* when no statically extractable call is found.
*
* Also recognizes the actionEditContext / actionCreateContext / actionFragmentContext
* aggregator pattern: if the file calls one of those aggregators at top level,
* we look for an 'abilityKey' => SomePolicy::CONST entry inside the args array
* and treat it as the top-level ability.
*/
private function extractTopLevelAbility(string $source, string $fileRel, array &$violations): ?string
{
@@ -203,6 +208,7 @@ class DetailDrawerFragmentContractTest extends TestCase
$hasTopLevelMatch = false;
$hasNestedMatch = false;
$extracted = null;
$insideTopLevelAggregator = false;
foreach ($lines as $line) {
// Update brace depth AFTER matching this line so a `{` on the same
@@ -218,6 +224,18 @@ class DetailDrawerFragmentContractTest extends TestCase
$hasNestedMatch = true;
}
}
// actionEditContext / actionCreateContext / actionFragmentContext aggregator pattern.
// The aggregator args use a [ ... ] array literal (not a { ... } block),
// so brace-depth tracking does not bracket them; we track the array
// opening with a separate "inside aggregator args" sticky flag instead.
if (!$insideTopLevelAggregator && $depth === 0 && preg_match('/actionEditContext\s*\(|actionCreateContext\s*\(|actionFragmentContext\s*\(/', $line)) {
$insideTopLevelAggregator = true;
}
if ($insideTopLevelAggregator && !$hasTopLevelMatch && preg_match('/[\'"]abilityKey[\'"]\s*=>\s*([A-Za-z_\\\\][A-Za-z0-9_\\\\:]*)/', $line, $am)) {
$extracted = $am[1];
$hasTopLevelMatch = true;
$insideTopLevelAggregator = false;
}
$opens = substr_count($line, '{');
$closes = substr_count($line, '}');
$depth += $opens - $closes;